ok, what I didn't get about this Geithner criticism is: which guarantees do you have? You have Citibank go bankrupt and the next thing is Stanford's bank of Antigua controls the banking market of the US. Ok, they're bankrupt also. Anyway, to have guarantees, you simply need to nationalize the banks. Simply to avoid that you are the next ex-kennedy or the next ex black on American soil. I mean the current government is otherwise from being stated not exactly THE ESTABLISHMENT. As head of state it's no problem to fire some state worker. It's irresponsible to loose 62 bio $ in 3 months. It's kinda dillusional, paranoid or maybe mad. To express it again: I want to have some guarantees. I guess its the easiest thing to introduce these guys to some new kind of responsibility as a state worker.
Ok it's Obamas fault that he did silence the 92 rerun of Clintons "its the economy stupid."

Furthermore, I like to discuss things. This moment seems to be over. Whether or nor not Obama likes the current state, he needs to come to grips fast.