An investment manager has attacked US regulators for failing to act on his tip-off about Bernard Madoff's alleged $50bn (£33bn) fraud.
buzzflash:Sec guys are waffling pizza slices about "executive privilege" on a president that is not in office anymore.
Commentary on SEC:
What astonished me most today was that I found some similiarly angry article at the bbc today that was totally untypical for the BBC; http://www.ccoaler.blogspot.com/2009/02/investment-manager-has-attacked-us.html
What these bastards are trying to sublime so masterfully is that Madoff was the head of NASDAQ and he had all the merits that made him eligible for investment and it's another big issue that all the Bushies try to cover him. He came into office 5 minutes ahead of Clinton and it's very strange that Clinton didn't catch him but that he prevailed for another 8 years. The obnoxiousness with what a federal institution is acting in this case makes it a syndicate member and not a part of a state that is formed by the sum of its citzens. The contradiction that is sustained here is in fact that it contradicts the constitution. But not due to a SEC that is lying and its failure to serve. It's because humans are created equal and they were intentionally lured into twilight in this case.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Privacy issues
- as a third party google uses cookies to switch commercials
- Double Dart cookies are being used
- Als Drittanbieter verwendet Google Cookies zur Anzeigenschaltung auf Ihrer Website.
- Durch Verwendung des DART-Cookies wird die Anzeigenschaltung anhand der Besuche der Nutzer auf Ihren Websites und anderen Websites im Internet für Google ermöglicht.


0 Kommentare:
Post a Comment